View Full Version : Look Here!!!


rehabisforquitters
04-18-2005, 09:19 PM
Hey, i am now editing this post, cuz i edited the video. its much better now.
ummmmmm.......
yay!

bald muffin
04-18-2005, 09:21 PM
Interesting. Where are the eyes?

gekdubbelspek
04-19-2005, 06:54 AM
Interesting. Where are the eyes?

Are you fucking blind
(Excuse me for the bad language)

Gus
04-19-2005, 07:29 AM
lol , ... hes blind alright... there to the right ... you must have a small monitor if you cant see em.

Nizzle
04-19-2005, 10:17 AM
look before you go (...) i just got bored.


http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y114/nizzlenizzle/mejiko.bmp

john
05-01-2005, 12:24 AM
look before you go (...) i just got bored.


http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y114/nizzlenizzle/mejiko.bmp

Look's a little like a friend of mine :D

Ilikepandas
05-01-2005, 12:32 AM
I made little people using noses as the bodies and heads, moustaches as the arms and har and eyes as the feet


sad ain't I?

rehabisforquitters
02-27-2006, 09:57 PM
BUUUUUUMMMMPPP!!!! This thread is SOOOO OLD!!!
I felt like bringing this back up so that the newer members could see it.

MrNaPaLm32
02-27-2006, 10:22 PM
i really dont think they do...there are WAY too many dress up games.

bfchickenchaser
02-27-2006, 11:01 PM
Look's a little like a friend of mine :D


OMG! JOHN! I'VE NEVER SEEN HIM POST (that's a lie, i have but it's rare. I'm throwing a party. Everyone's invited. Be at my house at midnight everybody)

john
02-28-2006, 02:37 PM
OMG! JOHN! I'VE NEVER SEEN HIM POST (that's a lie, i have but it's rare. I'm throwing a party. Everyone's invited. Be at my house at midnight everybody)

Can I come? I'll bring the Llama!

diet poop
02-28-2006, 02:45 PM
Llama, its whats for dinner.

DAMN! I gotta stop doin that *smacks forehead*

john
02-28-2006, 02:48 PM
Llama, its whats for dinner.

DAMN! I gotta stop doin that *smacks forehead*

Diet poop it's what for-- ...oh god...

diet poop
02-28-2006, 02:52 PM
Oh no! Its contaigious! Better get plenty of rest and drink lots of gatorade!!

rehabisforquitters
02-28-2006, 07:09 PM
i really dont think they do...there are WAY too many dress up games.
Wow, you're such a badass, telling me how stupid of an idea I had. I totally respect you now. How about you stop replying to my threads?

MrNaPaLm32
03-02-2006, 01:53 AM
Wow, you're such a badass, telling me how stupid of an idea I had. I totally respect you now. How about you stop replying to my threads?or I coudnt... and excercise my right to the first amendment.

rehabisforquitters
03-02-2006, 01:59 AM
You do have that right, it's just that no one on here wants to see you use it.

MrNaPaLm32
03-02-2006, 02:30 AM
hmmm. 6/9 people said no/ dont care. i wonder what that means...
http://gprime.net/board/showthread.php?t=6091

Cain
03-02-2006, 02:56 AM
well, not really, it means that we dont hate you.

take me for example, you seem to be a nice guy, you even made me an awsome sig for free.

this does not mean i want to see pointless arguments on the web.

and i hate to point this out. but this is a paid for server, via, a private server. this means the owner is the single head of the server. if you are not tagging along so far, this means that it is a monarchy, not a democracy, therefore, you have no rights, privledges, ammendments, and whatnot, unless the owner of the server gives you these. and im afraid the us government does not own this server.

no offence intended.

MrNaPaLm32
03-02-2006, 03:12 AM
well, not really, it means that we dont hate you.

take me for example, you seem to be a nice guy, you even made me an awsome sig for free.

this does not mean i want to see pointless arguments on the web.

and i hate to point this out. but this is a paid for server, via, a private server. this means the owner is the single head of the server. if you are not tagging along so far, this means that it is a monarchy, not a democracy, therefore, you have no rights, privledges, ammendments, and whatnot, unless the owner of the server gives you these. and im afraid the us government does not own this server.

no offence intended.I completely understand. if you look at the very first post that started everything. you can guess who it was made by.

Ilikepandas
03-04-2006, 03:25 AM
WTF??? I AM MrNapalm32!! I am the thirty second napalm (mister) to have ever existed!

rehabisforquitters
03-04-2006, 11:09 AM
or I coudnt... and excercise my right to the first amendment.
So you're saying that we're all in America, with rights that the constitution provides?

MrNaPaLm32
03-04-2006, 12:17 PM
So you're saying that we're all in America, with rights that the constitution provides?nope. but heres this anyways

Canadian Bill of Rights

R.S.C. 1985, Appendix III
An Act for the Recognition and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [S.C. 1960, c.44]
Preamble

The Parliament of Canada, affirming that the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions;
Affirming also that men and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law;
And being desirous of enshrining these principles and the human rights and fundamental freedoms derived from them, in a Bill of Rights which shall reflect the respect of Parliament for its constitutional authority and which shall ensure the protection of these rights and freedoms in Canada:
Therefore, Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows:
PART I

BILL OF RIGHTS

1. It is hereby recognized and declared that in Canada there have existed and shall continue to exist without discrimination by reason of race, national origin, colour, religion or sex, the following human rights and fundamental freedoms, namely,
(a) the right of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property and the right not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law; (b) the right of the individual to equality before the law and the protection of the law; (c) freedom of religion; (d) freedom of speech; (e) freedom of assembly and of association; and (f) freedom of the press. 2. Every law of Canada shall, unless it is expressly declared by an Act of Parliament of Canada that it shall operate notwithstanding the Canadian Bill of Rights, be so construed and applied as not to abrogate, abridge or infringe or to authorize the abrogation, abridgment or infringement of any of the rights or freedoms herein recognized and declared, and in particular, no law of Canada shall be construed or applied so as to
(a) authorize or effect the arbitrary detention, imprisonment or exile of a person; (b) impose or authorize the imposition of cruel and unusual treatment or punishment; (c) deprive a person who has been arrested or detained (i) of the right to be informed promptly of the reason for his arrest or detention, (ii) of the right to retain and instruct counsel without delay, or (iii) of the remedy by way of habeas corpus for the determination of the validity of his detention and for his release if the detention is not lawful; (d) authorize a court, tribunal, commission, board or other authority to compel a person to give evidence if he is denied counsel, protection against self-crimination or other constitutional safeguards; (e) deprive a person of the right to a fair hearing in accordance to the principles of fundamental justice for the determination of his rights and obligations; (f) deprive a person charged with a criminal offence of the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to the law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, or of the right to reasonable bail without just cause; and (g) deprive a person of the right to the assistance to an interpreter in any proceedings in which he is involved or in which he is a party or a witness, before a court, commission, board or other tribunal, if he does not understand or speak the language in which such proceedings are conducted. 3. (1) Subject to subsection (2), the Minister of Justice shall, in accordance with such regulations as may be prescribed by the Governor General in Council, examine every regulation transmitted to the Clerk of the Privy Council for registration pursuant to the Statutory Instruments Act and every Bill introduced in or presented to the House of Commons by a Minister of the Crown in order to ascertain whether any of the provisions thereof are inconsistent with the purposes and provisions of this Part and he shall report any such inconsistency to the House of Commons at the first convenient opportunity.
(2) A regulation need not be examined in accordance with subsection (1) if prior to being made it was examined as a proposed regulation in accordance with section 3 of the Statutory Instruments Act to ensure that it was not inconsistent with the purposes and provisions of this Part.
4. The provisions of this Part shall be known as the Canadian Bill of Rights.

Heyyou27
03-04-2006, 12:55 PM
NaP, you take things too far.

Led_Zeppelin
03-04-2006, 01:24 PM
Look's a little like a friend of mine :D

Who, Dave?

MrNaPaLm32
03-04-2006, 05:51 PM
NaP, you take things too far.welcome to the real world.

Cain
03-04-2006, 09:32 PM
nope. but heres this anyways

Canadian Bill of Rights

R.S.C. 1985, Appendix III
An Act for the Recognition and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [S.C. 1960, c.44]
Preamble

The Parliament of Canada, affirming that the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions;
Affirming also that men and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law;
And being desirous of enshrining these principles and the human rights and fundamental freedoms derived from them, in a Bill of Rights which shall reflect the respect of Parliament for its constitutional authority and which shall ensure the protection of these rights and freedoms in Canada:
Therefore, Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows:
PART I

BILL OF RIGHTS

1. It is hereby recognized and declared that in Canada there have existed and shall continue to exist without discrimination by reason of race, national origin, colour, religion or sex, the following human rights and fundamental freedoms,.......

ok, thats two countries, still 190 more countries to go....translate them to english please.

oh, and yup http://geography.about.com/cs/countries/a/numbercountries.htm

there is 190 to go, not just a number picked out of the air.

MrNaPaLm32
03-04-2006, 11:15 PM
ok, thats two countries, still 190 more countries to go....translate them to english please.

oh, and yup http://geography.about.com/cs/countries/a/numbercountries.htm

there is 190 to go, not just a number picked out of the air.yes, but this server is based in canada. and also there arn't 190 countries represented on gprime. some people fake the countries they live in. Canada took me 30 seconds on google. doing what you have asked...would take too much time.(because I have a life)

Heyyou27
03-04-2006, 11:21 PM
yes, but this server is based in canada. and also there arn't 190 countries represented on gprime. some people fake the countries they live in. Canada took me 30 seconds on google. doing what you have asked...would take too much time.(because I have a life)
Actually the server is in the U.S., so it applies to U.S. law.

MrNaPaLm32
03-04-2006, 11:29 PM
Actually the server is in the U.S., so it applies to U.S. law.I listed both :)

Cain
03-04-2006, 11:34 PM
yes, but this server is based in canada. and also there arn't 190 countries represented on gprime. some people fake the countries they live in. Canada took me 30 seconds on google. doing what you have asked...would take too much time.(because I have a life)

You DO realize it was you who responded with using multiple countries right systems to try and "gain the upper hand" in a pointless argument. i merely beleive that i should make you work for that point. the world isnt free, why should winning an argument be?