UltimateGamer139
10-22-2006, 04:02 PM
This is the place for dead baby jokes
|
View Full Version : Dead Baby Jokes UltimateGamer139 10-22-2006, 04:02 PM This is the place for dead baby jokes NOWAK 10-22-2006, 04:05 PM no just no. Ryu-Nacho 10-22-2006, 04:49 PM Sorry, but dead baby jokes suck. Actually, no. I'm not sorry. Natus Lumen 10-22-2006, 04:52 PM What's worse than 4 dead babies in 7 trash cans? 7 dead babies in 4 trash cans. What do you do with 4 dead babies and a sheet of glass? Make a coffee table. What's the difference between a Ferarri and 50 dead babies? I don't have a Ferarri in my garage. What's the difference between 50 bowling balls and 50 dead babies? You can't unload 50 bowling balls with a pitchfork. What's this: #? I dunno but here come some more. ######## That last one was just kind of random. ===== Sorry, but dead baby jokes suck. Actually, no. I'm not sorry. You're right, they do. I just like to entertain newbs. gwia 10-23-2006, 02:46 AM Dead Baby Jokes are not even remotley funny and are stupider than "Your Mum" jokes. Axel 10-23-2006, 07:39 AM Dead Baby Jokes are not even remotley funny and are stupider than "Your Mum" jokes. Uh huh... that's why you made a "Your Mum" joke, you frickin' hypocrite. no knife 10-23-2006, 11:28 AM jokes you're a "noob". paranoia 10-23-2006, 03:32 PM Man, we sure are running out of thread topics. Siriustar 10-23-2006, 04:07 PM What's worse than 4 dead babies in 7 trash cans? 7 dead babies in 4 trash cans. Actually, the other way around would be worse, because as it stands, you are saying that putting seven babies (theoretically unseparated, due to a high baby/trash can ratio) into four trash cans is worse than putting four babies into seven trash cans (which would necessitate the separation of the babies so as to accomodate the filling of seven trash cans with four babies). In summation, this thread is not a good idea. viper.gtsr 10-23-2006, 05:54 PM no just no. Yes. Natus Lumen 10-23-2006, 06:34 PM Actually, the other way around would be worse, because as it stands, you are saying that putting seven babies (theoretically unseparated, due to a high baby/trash can ratio) into four trash cans is worse than putting four babies into seven trash cans (which would necessitate the separation of the babies so as to accomodate the filling of seven trash cans with four babies). In summation, this thread is not a good idea. That's what I meant. I just thought hearing someone try to prove me wrong by speaking in technicality (and I knew someone would) about dead babies. I had to say it out loud for it to be funny, but a "High Dead baby to trash can ratio" won't cease to amuse me for a long time now. |