View Full Version : Forum consolidation
blackice 08-06-2006, 12:37 PM Paranoia brought up a good point. There doesn't really seem to be a need for 3 different 'General' forums anymore. Lately I've been considering getting rid of the Lots O Nonsense forum and just leaving the 2 others.
What say the gprime population?
(sorry paranoia, I know you have a poll in yours, but this needs to be out for the general population, not just the veterans)
Led_Zeppelin 08-06-2006, 01:22 PM General ramblings for sure.
Frookie 08-06-2006, 01:50 PM yeah, General Ramblings, they both count towards your post total, if it merged with Useless Crap, there would either be no section where your posts don't count toward your post total or a larger section where your posts don't count toward your post total
Keep them seperate, general ramblings is more serious than lots o nonsense.
Heyyou27 08-06-2006, 08:01 PM We could merge "Mature Conversation" with "Useless crap".
viper.gtsr 08-06-2006, 08:30 PM Separate
nickychris3 08-06-2006, 08:51 PM If they were merged (which I hope not), would it be called useless nonsense or lot's o crap?
We could merge "Mature Conversation" with "Useless crap".
HWO ABOUT I MERGE U WITH USELESS CRAP!?!!?!?
Frookie 08-07-2006, 01:24 AM someone's being testy now
does anyone else see the logic in my previous post?
Heyyou27 08-07-2006, 12:06 PM HWO ABOUT I MERGE U WITH USELESS CRAP!?!!?!?
:(
aaproductions 08-07-2006, 01:36 PM I say we merge it with General Ramblings. It's all really the same thing. But if you do, you will have to change the description of General Ramblings.
viper.gtsr 08-07-2006, 02:38 PM Ha, It's a tie.
Firedove 08-07-2006, 03:14 PM Crack down more on General ramblings and merge Lots O with Useless Crap.
Considering Lots O consists of forum games it would make more sense to not have them up your post count.
nickychris3 08-07-2006, 05:44 PM Will any threads be lost in the process?
blackice 08-07-2006, 06:37 PM no, everything would be mass-moved
Lots o nonsense was made so that the GR forum wouldn't be as cluttered up... so why should we merge it if that would just ruin the whole point of it?
nickychris3 08-07-2006, 07:25 PM That's why I voted "Leave it seperate."
blackice 08-07-2006, 08:34 PM LoN was made for one specific thing, that has long since died off.
nickychris3 08-07-2006, 10:26 PM But there would be too many active threads in one forum. Everyone would be fighting for attention.... a lot more than they do currently.
Willy_Wonka 08-08-2006, 05:36 PM Whoops... i meant general ramblings, not to be merged with usless crap. Would it be called
1.) Lots O' Ramblings
or
2.) General Nonsense
I like #2 heh number two
Frookie 08-08-2006, 05:42 PM blol, I like #2 as well, General Nonsense > Lots O' Ramblings
nickychris3 08-08-2006, 05:59 PM :glare:
poisonedcandy_X 08-09-2006, 01:18 AM That's why I voted "Leave it seperate."
Yeah, I agree. I think it's fine the way it is, so why change it? :blink:
Cos people stuff up the sections by putting the wrong threads in.
Firedove 08-10-2006, 12:19 PM Closer than I expected.
murderbydeath 08-11-2006, 04:28 PM HWO ABOUT I MERGE U WITH USELESS CRAP!?!!?!?
lol
Frookie 08-11-2006, 09:04 PM I found that funny as well, but honestly, useless crap is just like a spam section of an e-mail account
Which section was made first, Lots O' Nonsense, or Useless Crap?
Heyyou27 08-12-2006, 10:09 PM Which section was made first, Lots O' Nonsense, or Useless Crap?
Lots O' Nonsense.
Then merge it with Useless Crap, keeping all the threads, but leaving it still as "Lots O' Nonsense".
Frookie 08-13-2006, 10:49 AM I guess there's no point really to merge all three together, but why merge Lots O' Nonsense with Useless Crap when the posts in Useless Crap don't count towards your post total but the one's in General Ramblings do count, along with the fact that the posts in Lots O' Nonsense do count as well towards the overall post total?
Led_Zeppelin 08-13-2006, 01:21 PM Close poll.
|