MrNaPaLm32
11-22-2005, 12:09 AM
damn i want one of those. :drool: too bad its like $800 US. i cant imagine what it would be in canada.
|
View Full Version : Fx-57 MrNaPaLm32 11-22-2005, 12:09 AM damn i want one of those. :drool: too bad its like $800 US. i cant imagine what it would be in canada. Bosman310 11-22-2005, 01:20 PM one of what?? Heyyou27 11-22-2005, 03:43 PM damn i want one of those. :drool: too bad its like $800 US. i cant imagine what it would be in canada. I'm getting the X2 4800+ soon, although the FX-57 is the fastest single core processor out. Boong 11-22-2005, 07:01 PM what the heck is it? Heyyou27 11-23-2005, 05:06 PM what the heck is it? The FX-57 is currently the fastest single core gaming processor out, and the X2 4800+ is the fastest dual core gaming processor out. (In most benchmarks) TrUsTy{~}SoCkS 11-24-2005, 02:41 AM right, well i want one to run F.E.A.R. and properly run CounterStrike:Source on MrNaPaLm32 11-24-2005, 03:20 AM ill bet with this thing. you could run both at the same time. but the X2 4800+ would run better cuz its dual core. Heyyou27 11-24-2005, 11:05 AM ill bet with this thing. you could run both at the same time. but the X2 4800+ would run better cuz its dual core. With a small amount of overclocking I'll be able to make them the equivalent of dual FX-55s. MrNaPaLm32 11-25-2005, 02:58 AM yeah, but its like $1200 =/ Heyyou27 11-25-2005, 09:45 AM yeah, but its like $1200 =/ Actually, No. It's 787$ on newegg.com Drunken_Shinobi 11-25-2005, 10:52 PM Aha....fastest AMD prossecor? Well...I'm not going to be crazy enough to actually get one of those yet....maybe later. Boong 11-26-2005, 01:04 AM well let me pull out some comp. lingo for you my comp. processer 666 skdahjkdsa fsahffh is very fast Heyyou27 11-26-2005, 10:05 AM well let me pull out some comp. lingo for you my comp. processer 666 skdahjkdsa fsahffh is very fast NO WAY!! MrNaPaLm32 11-30-2005, 12:51 AM well let me pull out some comp. lingo for you my comp. processer 666 skdahjkdsa fsahffh is very fast HOW DID YOU GET ONE OF THOSE! Ive always wanted one! They dont even sell them and i want one! Kent 11-30-2005, 04:43 PM My computer (the one i'm on right now) is Pentium 3. o_O My dads, the one upstairs, is Pentium 4. Charles rules you all! 11-30-2005, 04:47 PM My computer runs on a pentium 2!! I need a new computer... Heyyou27 11-30-2005, 07:40 PM My computer runs on a pentium 2!! I need a new computer... Ouch. My current PC is a 3.6GHz P4 HTT with 2GB of RAM, but my new one (Parts come tomorrow) is an AMD Athlon X2 4800+ with 2GB of RAM and dual evga 7800 GT COs. Much better than my single overclocked 6800 GT. :) foulplay 12-01-2005, 12:33 AM Ouch. My current PC is a 3.6GHz P4 HTT with 2GB of RAM, but my new one (Parts come tomorrow) is an AMD Athlon X2 4800+ with 2GB of RAM and dual evga 7800 GT COs. Much better than my single overclocked 6800 GT. :) Your new setup is the same as my current, except I'm sporting dual ATI x1800s, Crossfire. :-[ EQ2 doesn't like nVidia cards much. Heyyou27 12-01-2005, 02:06 PM Your new setup is the same as my current, except I'm sporting dual ATI x1800s, Crossfire. :-[ EQ2 doesn't like nVidia cards much. You've gone to the dark side of AMD too? ;) MrNaPaLm32 12-03-2005, 02:02 PM im getting a AMD 64 3700+ and an ASUS sli motherboard for christmas =). but then since my current video card istn supported by that motherboard I have to run a VODOO II card from 1997. wohoo! Heyyou27 12-03-2005, 03:31 PM im getting a AMD 64 3700+ and an ASUS sli motherboard for christmas =). but then since my current video card istn supported by that motherboard I have to run a VODOO II card from 1997. wohoo! Ouch. I'm enjoying my new X2 4800+(Overclocked to 2.6GHz) with 2 GB of RAM and Dual 7800 GTs. MrNaPaLm32 12-03-2005, 03:45 PM im 15 and i dont have a job. why do you like dual core? getting a fast single processor works fine. Dual processors suck for gaming. Heyyou27 12-03-2005, 06:11 PM im 15 and i dont have a job. why do you like dual core? getting a fast single processor works fine. Dual processors suck for gaming. Considering it's currently clocked at 2.6GHz and is the same as two FX-55s I don't think it "sucks for gaming". Yes I know that nearly all games out right now only use one thread but newer games will begin to use two. Another reason I decided on the X2 4800+ are the multitasking abilities and the price difference was too small not to get one. MrNaPaLm32 12-03-2005, 08:09 PM the FX-55 was considered the best gaming processor of all time. Its overclockability is outstanding. you could OC it to 3.2ghz on stock cooling. most who upgraded their cooling and had high speed ram were able to get it to 3.6. of course, saying its "equvelant" to two FX-55's isnt really true. X2 has a completely diffrent processor structure. Dispite a game being dual channel compatible, its still the same math going in and out of it. its just splitting the work. a dual core processor the same speed as a single core processor will still yeild about the same performance levels. Heyyou27 12-03-2005, 10:40 PM the FX-55 was considered the best gaming processor of all time. Its overclockability is outstanding. you could OC it to 3.2ghz on stock cooling. most who upgraded their cooling and had high speed ram were able to get it to 3.6. of course, saying its "equvelant" to two FX-55's isnt really true. X2 has a completely diffrent processor structure. Dispite a game being dual channel compatible, its still the same math going in and out of it. its just splitting the work. a dual core processor the same speed as a single core processor will still yeild about the same performance levels. First off, The FX-55 no longer the fastest gaming processor. It was beaten by the FX-57 and even the Pentium 4 670 in many benchmarks. Also you're not correct about the FX-55 being an extreme overclocker. Sure it overclocks well but, do you honestly expect two hardware cores on one chip to clock as high as a single core? Another thing you're incorrect about is the X2 4800+. It's essentially dual FX-53s. Being a slower version of the FX-55 at 2.4GHz instead of 2.6GHz. The FX-55 has a 1MB L2 Cache, and each processor on my X2 4800+ has 1MB of L2. So tell me then, if that's the case how is it a different "processor structure" when in reality they are very similar and the only real difference is the 200MHz increase on an FX-55. I admit that an FX-55 would be better for games in general, but for the price difference it doesn’t hurt to buy an X2 series for it has more future potential. MrNaPaLm32 12-04-2005, 12:51 AM first of all, did i say it "is". no, i said it is considered to be. the FX-55 is a helluv a lot different than the X2's. if you dont think so you need help. rehabisforquitters 12-04-2005, 01:15 AM damn i want one of those. :drool: too bad its like $800 US. i cant imagine what it would be in canada. Why do you need it? Do you do a lot of hardcore gaming? Or a hell of a lot of graphic design? MrNaPaLm32 12-04-2005, 01:24 AM u dont GET the fx-57 unless ure a gamer. i still want one, even though i dont game a whole lot. I play call of duty every once in a while. rehabisforquitters 12-04-2005, 01:31 AM u dont GET the fx-57 unless ure a gamer. So if you only play COD every once in a while, then.....why do you need it? I mean yeah, it's orgasmic just thinking about having it, but unless you game A LOT then you really have no use for it. MrNaPaLm32 12-04-2005, 03:02 AM you could use it to. its called running photoshop, flash, endorphin, firefox, and burning a DVD all at the same time, running faster than ever. rehabisforquitters 12-04-2005, 03:07 AM That's what I asked about earlier. I asked if you were trying to do graphic design and you said only for gaming and that you didn't game, so I assumed. Heyyou27 12-04-2005, 08:33 PM first of all, did i say it "is". no, i said it is considered to be. the FX-55 is a helluv a lot different than the X2's. if you dont think so you need help. You're right, the X2s have more future potential. MrNaPaLm32 12-04-2005, 08:53 PM thats not waht i meant Boong 12-04-2005, 09:15 PM I got a Fx-696437342786423873292, Pentium-6, Ooh blah! Heyyou27 12-05-2005, 05:40 PM thats not waht i meant Well I don't care. Here was my 3DMark05 score from the processors that in your opinion "Arn't good for gaming". MrNaPaLm32 12-05-2005, 06:06 PM that score is coming from your 2 7800GT's. Heyyou27 12-05-2005, 06:11 PM that score is coming from your 2 7800GT's. You caught me ;). Actually though they're the evga 7800 GTs with the copper heatsinks. They come clocked at 470MHz core and 1.1GHz memory. MrNaPaLm32 12-05-2005, 08:28 PM i thot that that was the most STABLE overclock but whatever. i only look at the cheap ones anyway. I for one can't afford two yet alone one. Im pretty sure ill be getting a 6800. I think it plays every game on high settings. and once it gets old ill just buy another and make it top noch again. |