View Full Version : Cloverfiled Movie


Moth
05-11-2008, 10:36 PM
I. LOVE. THIS. MOVIE.


Also:
http://www.uberimage.org/1/cloverfield.png


EDIT: Someone move this into TV/Movies.

Supa Fool
05-11-2008, 10:37 PM
Yes, I just wish I could've watched it on a bigger screen so I could understand some parts better. Like the last scene at the amusement park.

gabrielwhist
05-11-2008, 11:25 PM
Its either the monster falling into the ocean in the background, or a satellite falling into the ocean, which awakes the monster. At least those are the two prevalent theories.

I saw it on the big screen. It was AWESOME.

ninjashoes
05-12-2008, 01:36 PM
I was dissapointed with it

God
05-12-2008, 03:03 PM
From the viral stuff they put out before the movie was released, it's determined that it's a satellite. I didn't find that out myself, someone told me.

gabrielwhist
05-12-2008, 07:58 PM
I was dissapointed with it

Well thats because your a lame loser who utterly fails at life.

Drunken_Shinobi
05-14-2008, 07:50 PM
I haven't seen Cloverfield yet...but I'm hoping to see it because everybody keeps making a big deal about the way it was filmed.

gabrielwhist
05-14-2008, 11:01 PM
Its more than that. Its the most honest movie I've ever seen as far as human emotions go.

insan3
05-17-2008, 02:59 PM
I thought it was just average. I think its really original, the whole hand camera idea, but it was really short and not that great. I never even noticed that monster thing at the end. im actually gonna go put cloverfield in right now and see

Supa Fool
05-17-2008, 03:46 PM
Ya the ending was weak but the rest was very good.

gabrielwhist
05-18-2008, 04:21 AM
Ya the ending was weak but the rest was very good.
Idiot.

I thought it was just average. I think its really original, the whole hand camera idea, but it was really short and not that great. I never even noticed that monster thing at the end. im actually gonna go put cloverfield in right now and see
Did you see it in the theatres or on a regular TV for one. For two, the acting was simply amazing, as was the writing. But I guess you just didn't pay any attention to that.

Supa Fool
05-18-2008, 02:57 PM
Idiot.

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y275/robertnmike/Pure%20Pwnage/NO_U.jpg

gabrielwhist
05-18-2008, 08:55 PM
Keep telling yourself that. Don't realize the fact that the movie ended with the death of every character and the monster on the loose was far more realistic and original than most any other Hollywood movie. Completely ignore the fact that the characters, in the face of death, realized that the only important thing was to be honest about how they felt and be with the one they loved in their darkest of times. Absolutely disregard the amazing filmography and breath taking special effects. Don't even think for a moment how much more of a lasting impact the movie made with that ending than any other concievable ending could have. Yeah, you're right, the ending sucked and I'm an idiot. God I hate idiots.

Heyyou27
05-19-2008, 12:15 PM
The same people that loved this also thought Pirates of the Caribbean 3 and Spiderman 2 were the best movies of all time. To these fools, advertising budget = film quality. The ending wasn't the only part of this film that sucked, and I can't help but laugh at the moron calling Cloverfield realistic.

gabrielwhist
05-19-2008, 03:16 PM
Yeah, because you can't realistically display human emotion in an unrealistic movie. Totally. Jackass.

Supa Fool
05-19-2008, 05:35 PM
Keep telling yourself that. Don't realize the fact that the movie ended with the death of every character and the monster on the loose was far more realistic and original than most any other Hollywood movie. Completely ignore the fact that the characters, in the face of death, realized that the only important thing was to be honest about how they felt and be with the one they loved in their darkest of times. Absolutely disregard the amazing filmography and breath taking special effects. Don't even think for a moment how much more of a lasting impact the movie made with that ending than any other concievable ending could have. Yeah, you're right, the ending sucked and I'm an idiot. God I hate idiots.

Yea, cause monsters intentionally go after a single helicopter when there is a large group of bombers he can go for instead.

Heyyou27
05-19-2008, 10:05 PM
Yeah, because you can't realistically display human emotion in an unrealistic movie. Totally. Jackass.http://magneticelectric.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/britney-spears-crying.jpg

gabrielwhist
05-19-2008, 11:31 PM
Yea, cause monsters intentionally go after a single helicopter when there is a large group of bombers he can go for instead.
Yeah, cause he wasn't going after EVERY helicopter.

http://magneticelectric.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/britney-spears-crying.jpg
Great comeback man.

gussa
05-20-2008, 08:28 AM
http://magneticelectric.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/britney-spears-crying.jpg

in garybells defense, science fiction is actually a really good genre to explore and use human emotion.

Heyyou27
05-20-2008, 11:36 AM
Great comeback man.

http://www.aboriginalartstore.com.au/photos/malcolm_jagamarra_clifford_pos_photo.jpg

Supa Fool
05-20-2008, 08:19 PM
Yeah, cause he wasn't going after EVERY helicopter.

Nope he wasn't, he was busy plowing through the city destroying buildings. Then he attacked the hellicopter randomly after being bombed by planes far away from them.

Nitz
05-20-2008, 08:30 PM
Yea, cause monsters intentionally go after a single helicopter when there is a large group of bombers he can go for instead.

Yeah, cause monsters are real, and we know exactly how they all think. Oh and it was a documentary.

Supa Fool
05-20-2008, 09:38 PM
No, I mean wouldn't any creature, made-up or real, go after something that is attacking it rather than a little bug of a hellicopter? And what does a documentary have to do with the discussion?

Erythro
05-21-2008, 12:09 AM
I thought it was just average. I think its really original, the whole hand camera idea, but it was really short and not that great. I never even noticed that monster thing at the end. im actually gonna go put cloverfield in right now and see

It wasn't original. They took the idea from the Blair Witch Project.

gabrielwhist
05-21-2008, 12:20 AM
http://www.aboriginalartstore.com.au/photos/malcolm_jagamarra_clifford_pos_photo.jpg
Hey Q-tay.

Nope he wasn't, he was busy plowing through the city destroying buildings. Then he attacked the hellicopter randomly after being bombed by planes far away from them.
No, he was destroying everything he could get his hands on. That includes slow moving helicopters, and not super fast airplanes.

It wasn't original. They took the idea from the Blair Witch Project.
Yeah because using the same filmography style makes it a total rip off.

Erythro
05-21-2008, 06:53 AM
Yeah because using the same filmography style makes it a total rip off.


I never said that - i'm just saying that the filming style isn't amazingly original.

gabrielwhist
05-22-2008, 01:48 AM
Still more original than most, and its more the way they use that style than that style itself that makes it original.

Boong
05-26-2008, 08:56 PM
just watched it and I have come to a conclusion. decent.